cur-mud-geon: anyone who hates hypocrisy and pretense and has the temerity to say so; anyone with the habit of pointing out unpleasant facts in an engaging and humorous manner
MATC has now ended the suspense. Whew! It has officially increased its tax take by the 4.9% that it miraculously managed to get down to from the original 'straw man' of 6.4%. This codifies the fact that MATC's appetite for tax dollars has risen by some 30% over the past five years. MATC's leadership, if it can be called that without demeaning the word, just can't seem to understand that, while it is impervious to the wants and needs of the citizenry it serves, it really has permitted its reach to exceed our grasp.
MATC strikes me as an iceberg looking for a ship to sink. It is floating along with the tip showing while the bulk of the 'bloat' lies just under the waterline, out of sight and, too often, out of mind. Until it hits the ship of taxpayers yet again. The taxpayers on this 'ship of fools' have finally come to understand, at least in Germantown, that they would be better-served if they were permitted to disembark from the current ship that continues to be victimized by the MATC iceberg...year after year after year after year!
That disembarkation is, however, contingent on so many disparate factors as to seem nearly unachievable. First and foremost is that failure to make the petition to the state technical college board seeking a move from MATC to another contiguous tech college district renders all the other points moot. If that is filed, then we wait and see what the august state tech college board members decide is to be our fate. The last such application was made in 2004 and was denied. That doesn't necessarily mean that this petition would suffer the same fate...but it is probably a decent precursor. The only other successful action of this nature involved Germantown's petition to be moved into the MATC district back in the early 1970s. (Ironic, isn't it?)
Back to the basics, however. This rate of increase could've been far better controlled if the governing board for MATC were subject to re-election. It isn't. It is subject only to the parochial appointment desires of MATC. Talk about a great deal, huh? If I'm going to be governed by someone, I'd love the opportunity to pick the person without any outside interference over things such as how effective they'd be in administering their responsibilities. If I 'accidentally' picked someone that was in lock-step with my positions and goals, could I possibly be faulted? Sure, but it would be meaningless because no one could do anything about it except maybe move away to escape.
Maybe more to the point, I could've used the euphemism of a polar ice mass, a glacier, grinding everything in its path into submission. Pretty soon there'll be nothing left here to tax. It'll have been destroyed by the taxes rendered.
I guess the good news is that you can't tax the same dollar for more than 100 cents, so there is some ultimate end point. Yet, there are so many taxes being levied against each of our dollars that we get less and less while everything costs us more and more.
Maybe, IF we pursue the change in tech college districts, and IF the state tech college board approves, we can rid ourselves of MATC President Cole, his board and his kingdom of fire-breathing dragons that burn everything of value they can identify in their domain.
I believe a full scale audit of that institution is called for and I believe one or more of our elected officials at the state level needs to pick up that banner and carry it high for all to see. This is way past the point of being mere Blog fodder, although it sure has been good for that!